If you’re reading this, you’re probably interested in contributing to one of the Hyper projects! First, we’d like to say thank you! Projects like this one live-and-die based on the support they receive from others, and the fact that you’re even considering supporting the Hyper project is incredibly generous of you.
This document lays out general guidelines and advice for contributing to any of the Hyper projects. If you’re thinking of helping, start by reading this thoroughly and getting a feel for how the project works. If you’ve still got questions after reading this, please ask us in IRC: we’d be happy to clarify any questions you may have.
We’ve organized this guide into sections:
our code of conduct, which applies to all contributions of any kind
general guidelines for all contributors
specific information based on the type of contribution you’re thinking of making
Code Of Conduct¶
The following code of conduct applies to all projects that are under the umbrella of the hyper project.
In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as contributors and maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment include:
Using welcoming and inclusive language
Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
Focusing on what is best for the community
Showing empathy towards other community members
Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or advances
Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
Public or private harassment
Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic address, without explicit permission
Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting
Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.
Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful.
This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces when an individual is representing the project or its community. Examples of representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by contacting the project team by email. All complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident. Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.
Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other members of the project’s leadership.
Get Early Feedback¶
If you are contributing, do not feel the need to sit on your contribution until it is perfectly polished and complete. It helps everyone involved for you to seek feedback as early as you possibly can. Submitting an early, unfinished version of your contribution for feedback in no way prejudices your chances of getting that contribution accepted, and can save you from putting a lot of work into a contribution that is not suitable for the project.
The maintainers of a sub-project have the last word on whether or not a contribution is suitable for that project. We consider all contributions, but from time to time contributions will be rejected because they do not suit the project.
If necessary, a contributor should feel free to ask maintainers of other hyper projects to adjudicate, especially if they feel their contribution is being unfairly discriminated against.
If your contribution is rejected, don’t despair! So long as you followed these guidelines, you’ll have a much better chance of getting your next contribution accepted.
When contributing code, you’ll want to follow this checklist:
Fork the repository for the project in question on GitHub.
Run the tests to confirm they all pass on your system. If they don’t, you’ll need to investigate why they fail. If you’re unable to diagnose this yourself, raise it as a bug report by following the guidelines in this document: Bug Reports.
Write tests that demonstrate your bug or feature. Ensure that they fail.
Make your change.
Run the entire test suite again, confirming that all tests pass * including the ones you just added*.
Send a GitHub Pull Request containing your changes. GitHub Pull Requests are the expected method of code collaboration on this project. If you object to the GitHub workflow, you may mail a patch to one of the project maintainers.
The following sub-sections go into more detail on some of the points above.
Tests & Code Coverage¶
All Hyper projects have a substantial suite of tests, both unit tests and integration tests, and have 100% code and branch coverage. Whenever you contribute, you must write tests that exercise your contributed code, and you must not regress the code coverage.
To run the tests, you need to install tox. Once you have, you can run the
tests against all supported platforms by simply executing
If you’re having trouble running the tests, please consider raising a bug report using the guidelines in the Bug Reports section.
If you’ve done this but want to get contributing right away, you can take advantage of the fact that all Hyper projects use a continuous integration system. This system will automatically run the tests against any pull request raised against any Hyper repository. The continuous integration system treats a regression in code coverage as a failure of the test suite.
Before a contribution is merged, it must have a green run through the CI system.
Contributions will not be merged until they’ve been code reviewed. You should implement any code review feedback unless you strongly object to it. If you object to the code review feedback, you should make your case clearly and calmly. If, after doing so, the feedback is judged to apply still, you must either incorporate the feedback or withdraw your contribution.
If you are new or relatively new to Open Source, welcome! The Hyper project aims to be a gentle introduction to the world of Open Source. If you’re concerned about how best to contribute, please consider mailing a maintainer or asking for help on our Gitter community.
Please also check the Get Early Feedback section.
We have a security policy we take very seriously. Please read Security for more details.
Documentation improvements are always welcome! The documentation files for
individual projects live in the
docs/ directory of the codebase for that
project, and the general documentation for the project as a whole live in the
documentation repository. They’re written in reStructuredText, and use
Sphinx to generate the full suite of documentation.
When contributing documentation, please attempt to follow the style of the documentation files. Use a soft-limit of 79 characters wide in your text files and a semi-formal prose style.
Bug reports are hugely important! Before you raise one, though, please check through the GitHub issues for that project, both open and closed, to confirm that the bug hasn’t been reported before. Duplicate bug reports are a huge drain on the time of other contributors, and should be avoided as much as possible.
Feature requests are always welcome, but please note that all the general guidelines for contribution apply. Also note that the importance of a feature request without an associated Pull Request is always lower than the importance of one with an associated Pull Request: code is more valuable than ideas.